ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2022
Algorithm development and diagnostic accuracy testing for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: an Indian experience.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Terminating Routine Cord Blood RhD Typing of the Newborns to Guide Postnatal Anti-D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Based on the Results of Fetal RHD Genotyping.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe discovery of the cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) circulating in the maternal plasma enabled prediction of foetal RHD thus eliminating the risks associated with invasive procedures. Non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping has now become the standard approach in developed countries for management of alloimmunised women and is also used for targeted antenatal prophylaxis in non-alloimmunised women. MATERIALS AND
methodscffDNA was extracted from the plasma of 217 RhD negative pregnant women at a gestational age of 10-34 weeks. The foetal RHD genotype was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) amplification of exons 4, 5 and 10 in duplicates. After an initial 54 samples, foetal typing was carried out with RHD exons 5 and 10 for the remaining samples. CCR5, SRY and RASSF1A genes were used as controls. Results were compared with cord blood serological typing at birth.
resultsOut of the 217 women, 193 were non-immunised and 24 were alloimmunised. A conclusive diagnosis was obtained in 203 samples. Diagnosis was inconclusive in 14 samples; of these, foetal RHD genotype could be resolved in six samples after maternal and paternal RHD genotyping. A 100% diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were demonstrated in 209 women who had had a conclusive result. When the inconclusive samples were included, diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were more than 95% and specificity was 78.95%. DISCUSSION: Anti-D is still the leading cause of haemolytic disease of the foetus and the newborn in India. There is, therefore, a need to establish and develop an algorithm for antenatal RhD negative women in India. The positive results of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping, from the start of the 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.