ArticleIrish journal of medical science2022
Deprivation of patient liberty: a qualitative study of current practice among geriatricians in a tertiary setting.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Assisted Decision Making (Capacity) Act 2015 in Ireland is designed to support and maximise a person's capacity to make decisions, although it has not yet commenced. Amendments to the legislation propose to deal with deprivation of liberty of persons lacking capacity. Health care professionals such as geriatricians will need to focus on enabling patient autonomy in response to legislative changes.
aimsThis study aimed to explore geriatricians' experience in a tertiary hospital setting when dealing with deprivation of liberty scenarios.
methodsA generic qualitative study was undertaken in 2019 via 10 separate, semi-structured, in-person interviews with consultant geriatricians. The interview covered patient decision-making and deprivation of patient liberty in the acute setting, thoughts on proposed legislation and elements learned from experience. A thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsRegarding the potential deprivation of patient liberty, five themes emerged: (a) patient capacity, including assessment and opinions; (b) interaction of geriatricians with other professionals and dynamics amongst those that influence decision-making; (c) the environment of factors and frameworks shaping current practice; (d) medico-legal education and geriatricians recognising relevant, challenging cases; (e) the awareness of geriatricians of their attitudes and approaches, including reflecting on one's own practice.
conclusionsResults highlight a need for collaborative communication between doctors and legal professionals to achieve a structured and supportive framework to inform practice when working under any proposed legislation relating to deprivation of liberty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33818741What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.