Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33818714›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2021

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Li-Qing Li, Ying Zhou, Yong Huang, Ping Liang, Shi-Xiong Liang, Ting-Shi Su

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Qing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.71, River Road, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Yong HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Ping LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Shi-Xiong LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.71, River Road, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. shixliang@vip.sina.com.
Ting-Shi SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.71, River Road, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. sutingshi@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-4394
Guangxi Medical University · CNGuangxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

China International Medical Foundation-Tumor Precise Radiotherapy Spark Program 2019-N-11-01Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2020GXNSFAA297171National Natural Science Foundation of China 81903257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unclear whether robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is superior to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of SBRT with those of IMRT in HCCs with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 287 HCC patients with PVTT who underwent radiotherapy between January 2000 and January 2017. Of them, 154 and 133 patients were treated with IMRT and SBRT, respectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic control (IC), and local control (LC) were evaluated in univariable and propensity-score matched analyses.

resultsAfter matching, 102 well-paired patients were selected. There was no significant difference in the 6-, 12-, 24-, and 60-month cumulative OS (73.5, 42.9, 23.6, 7.6% vs. 72.4, 45.1, 29.8, 13.2%, p = 0.151), PFS (53.9, 29.3, 21.8, 7.5% vs. 54.5, 19.3, 12.0, 9.6%, p = 0.744), IC (61.4, 45.7, 39.0, 26.8% vs. 75.1, 45.8, 35.9, 28.7%, p = 0.144), and LC (85.2, 56.5, 52.1, 47.4% vs. 87.4, 65.2, 62.1, 62.1%, p = 0.191) between the IMRT and SBRT groups. A biologically effective dose assumed at an a/b ratio of 10 (BED

conclusionsWhen high-precision tracking technology is available, SBRT appears to be a safe and more time-efficient treatment, achieving comparable OS, PFS, IC and LC to IMRT for local advanced HCC with PVTT. A BED

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedVenous ThrombosisHumansPortal VeinRetrospective StudiesBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging CHepatic malignancyLocally advancedMacrovascular invasionPortal vein invasionPrimary liver cancerRadiotherapySurvivalTreatment outcomeTumor control

Identifiers

PMID33818714
OpenAlexW3132059120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.