ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Aortic strain in bicuspid aortic valve: an analysis.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aortic elastic properties and circulating matrix biomarkers in children with bicuspid aortic valve: an exploratory study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Speckle Strain Analysis of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Paediatric Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve-A Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is monitored by transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography (CT) angiography. However, it does not have any early marker of disease progression. This study evaluated speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) aortic and left ventricular (LV) strain prognostic values, their discriminative power, and their correlation with the degree of valvular regurgitation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort of 45 diagnosed with BAV and 20 gender and age matched controls. We performed 2D-STE aortic and LV strain analysis of the selected population. The cohort was followed-up during a median period of 19.9 months (IQR 12.9-25.2), and outcomes (hospital admission for heart failure (HF), aortic valve replacement (AVR), and death) were determined. The mean patient age was 46.6 ± 15.5 years and 80 % were male. LV indexed volumes and aortic diameter were higher in BAV patients. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was impaired (p < 0.001) and aortic GLS was significantly augmented (p = 0.027) in BAV patients. Aortic global circumferential strain (GCS) did not vary between groups. Aortic diameter was the best parameter related to BAV (AUC 0.92) and aortic GLS was best correlated with significant AR (AUC 0.76). AVR was the only outcome observed and its only predictor was indexed LV end-diastolic volume. BAV had impaired LV-GLS values. Aortic GLS was abnormally augmented in BAV patients, which might reflect higher aortic diameters that distorted strain calculations. STE aortic strain is related to AR but does not appear to be a reliable predictor of surgery in BAV patients, at 19 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33818697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.