Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33818395›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2021

A Mobile App for Self-management of Urgency and Mixed Urinary Incontinence in Women: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Towe Wadensten, Emma Nyström, Karin Franzén, Anna Lindam, Elisabet Wasteson, Eva Samuelsson

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03097549 nacompletednot on this map

Mobile App-treatment of Mixed and Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women - a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled142ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsTät®II Information app, Tät®II Treatment app
NCT07038811 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of the App Tät®II for Treatment of Urgency and Mixed Urinary Incontinence

TypeobservationalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsUrgency Incontinence, Mixed Incontinence, Urge and StressArmsTät®II
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Towe WadenstenFamily Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4874-221X
Emma NyströmFamily Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1745-6808
Karin FranzénWomen's Clinic, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9826-0462
Anna LindamUnit of Research, Education, and Development, Östersund Hospital, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6230-0354
Elisabet WastesonDepartment of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5314-0336
Eva SamuelssonFamily Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-0007
Umeå University · SEMid Sweden University · SEÖrebro University · SEÖstersunds Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women experience urgency (UUI) and mixed (MUI) urinary incontinence but commonly hesitate to seek care. Treatment access and self-management for these conditions can be supported through eHealth approaches.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the mobile app Tät II for self-management of UUI and MUI in women.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial included women ≥18 years old with UUI or MUI and ≥2 leakages per week. Those with red-flag symptoms were excluded. Participants were recruited via analog and digital advertisements and screened for initial selection through a web-based questionnaire. Data were collected using another questionnaire and a 2-day bladder diary. A telephone interview confirmed the symptom diagnosis. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive access to a treatment app (including pelvic floor muscle training, bladder training, psychoeducation, lifestyle advice, tailored advice, exercise log, reinforcement messages, and reminders) or an information app (control group), with no external treatment guidance provided. The primary outcome was incontinence symptoms at the 15-week follow-up, measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Urgency symptoms were assessed using the ICIQ-Overactive Bladder Module (ICIQ-OAB) and quality of life using the ICIQ-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol). Incontinence episode frequency (IEF) was calculated per bladder diary entries. Improvement was measured using the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement. All outcomes were self-reported. Cure was defined as no leakages per the bladder diary. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

resultsBetween April 2017 and March 2018, 123 women (mean age 58.3, SD 9.6 years) were randomized to the treatment (n=60, 2 lost to follow-up) or information (n=63) group. Of these, 35 (28%) women had UUI, and 88 (72%) had MUI. Mean ICIQ-UI SF score at follow-up was lower in the treatment group than in the information group (estimated difference -3.1, 95% CI -4.8 to -1.3). The estimated between-group difference was -1.8 (95% CI -2.8 to -0.99) for mean ICIQ-OAB score and -6.3 (95% CI -10.5 to -2.1) for the mean ICIQ-LUTSqol score at follow-up. IEF reduction from baseline to follow-up was greater in the treatment group (-10.5, IQR -17.5 to -3.5) than in the information group (P<.001). Improvement was reported by 87% (52/60) of treatment group participants and by 30% (19/63) of information group participants. The cure rate was 32% in the treatment group, and 6% in the information group (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-15.6; P=.002). About 67% (40/60) of the treatment group participants used the app more than thrice a week.

conclusionsThe treatment app was effective for improving urgency and mixed incontinence in women. When self-management is appropriate, this app may be a good alternative to pharmacological treatment or other conservative management, thus increasing access to care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03097549; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03097549.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSelf-ManagementUrinary IncontinenceAdolescentExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic FloorQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeeHealthmHealthmixed urinary incontinencemobile appself-managementsmartphone appurgency urinary incontinenceurinary incontinencewomen

Identifiers

PMID33818395
PMCPMC8056293
OpenAlexW3127752065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.