Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33818391›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Surveillance of the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Europe: Longitudinal Trend Analyses.

Lori Post, Kasen Culler, Charles B Moss, Robert L Murphy, Chad J Achenbach, Michael G Ison, Danielle Resnick, Lauren Nadya Singh, Janine White, Michael J Boctor and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Family and School Relationship during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lori PostBuehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3254
Kasen CullerFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-7623
Charles B MossInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-7112
Robert L MurphyInstitute of Global Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3936-2052
Chad J AchenbachDivison of Infectious Disease, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-7249
Michael G IsonDivison of Infectious Disease, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3347-9671
Danielle ResnickInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6285-3461
Lauren Nadya SinghBuehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-9614
Janine WhiteBuehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7204-477X
Michael J BoctorFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-8417
Sarah B WelchBuehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5609-3718
James Francis OehmkeBuehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-3443
Northwestern University · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted Europe, resulting in a high caseload and deaths that varied by country. The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has breached the borders of Europe. Public health surveillance is necessary to inform policy and guide leaders.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide advanced surveillance metrics for COVID-19 transmission that account for weekly shifts in the pandemic, speed, acceleration, jerk, and persistence, to better understand countries at risk for explosive growth and those that are managing the pandemic effectively.

methodsWe performed a longitudinal trend analysis and extracted 62 days of COVID-19 data from public health registries. We used an empirical difference equation to measure the daily number of cases in Europe as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R.

resultsNew COVID-19 cases slightly decreased from 158,741 (week 1, January 4-10, 2021) to 152,064 (week 2, January 11-17, 2021), and cumulative cases increased from 22,507,271 (week 1) to 23,890,761 (week 2), with a weekly increase of 1,383,490 between January 10 and January 17. France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom had the largest 7-day moving averages for new cases during week 1. During week 2, the 7-day moving average for France and Spain increased. From week 1 to week 2, the speed decreased (37.72 to 33.02 per 100,000), acceleration decreased (0.39 to -0.16 per 100,000), and jerk increased (-1.30 to 1.37 per 100,000).

conclusionsThe United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal, in particular, are at risk for a rapid expansion in COVID-19 transmission. An examination of the European region suggests that there was a decrease in the COVID-19 caseload between January 4 and January 17, 2021. Unfortunately, the rates of jerk, which were negative for Europe at the beginning of the month, reversed course and became positive, despite decreases in speed and acceleration. Finally, the 7-day persistence rate was higher during week 2 than during week 1. These measures indicate that the second wave of the pandemic may be subsiding, but some countries remain at risk for new outbreaks and increased transmission in the absence of rapid policy responses.

Indexed as

Public Health SurveillanceCOVID-19EuropeHumansLongitudinal StudiesAlbaniaAndorraArellano-Bond estimatorAustriaBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaCOVID 7-day lagCOVID transmission decelerationCOVID transmission jerkCroatiaCzech RepublicDenmarkdynamic panel dataEstoniaEuropean COVID transmission accelerationEuropean COVID transmission speedEurope COVIDEurope COVID surveillance systemEurope econometricsEurope Public Health SurveillanceEurope SARS-CoV-2Europe surveillance metricsFinlandFrancegeneralized method of the momentsGermanyglobal COVID surveillanceGMMGreeceGreenlandHungaryIcelandIrelandIsle of ManItalyLatviaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMoldovaMonacoMontenegroNetherlandsNorwayPolandPortugalRomaniaSan MarinoSARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2 surveillancesecond waveSerbiaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandUkraineUnited KingdomVatican Citywave two

Identifiers

PMID33818391
PMCPMC8080962
OpenAlexW3151261432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.