ArticleGenetica2021
Mitochondrial genome architecture and phylogenetic relationships of Odontesthes argentinensis within Atherinomorpha.
Article in Genetica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silversides are a widely distributed group across South America, with several species occupying marine, freshwater and estuarine environments. Several authors suggest main transitions among these environments took place during Pleistocene, and were accompanied with rapid speciation events. This scenario produced very limited genetic and morphological differentiation among the species. However, most of these surveys have an incomplete coverage of the intraspecific genetic diversity of the taxa studied. In this work, we reconstructed six mitochondrial genomes of O. argentinensis using transcriptomic data, and used them-in combination with several nuclear markers retrieved from the same transcriptomes-to explore the effect of additional coverage of intraspecific diversity of this species in phylogenetic reconstructions. Unlike previous works, phylogenetic analyses failed to identify O. argentinensis as a monophyletic group in relation with closely related taxa. Our results suggest that several species of the genus, especially those related to O. argentinensis, need further taxonomic revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33817771What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.