Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33817690›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

Toxicity of herbal medications suggested as treatment for COVID-19: A narrative review.

Michael A DiPietro, Christopher Mondie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Medical anthropology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antiviral effects of oleandrin.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  6. Toxicity of herbal medications suggested as treatment for COVID-19: A narrative review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Review
  7. The use ofAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A DiPietroDepartment of Emergency Medicine Newark Beth Israel Medical Center Newark New Jersey USA.
Christopher MondieDepartment of Emergency Medicine Newark Beth Israel Medical Center Newark New Jersey USA.
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the absence of a definitive cure, herbal medications are gaining increasing popularity in the general public for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although many herbal preparations are safe and can be used without complication, serious toxicities do occur. This article focuses on the major characteristics and toxicities of herbal preparations that have been proposed as treatments for COVID-19.

methodsA review was performed focusing on herbal preparations that have gained popularity as potential treatments for COVID-19. Some of these preparations have been directly recommended by government agencies, whereas others have gained popularity through various other news sources.

resultsThe herbal preparations covered in this paper include the cardiac glycoside oleandrin, plants of the

conclusionAlthough herbal preparations have been reported to aid in the treatment of COVID-19 with success, few clinical trials have been performed to evaluate their efficacy and instead rely mainly on

Indexed as

Chinese traditionalcomplementary therapiescoronavirusherbalherbal medicinemedicineplant poisoningtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID33817690
PMCPMC8011616
OpenAlexW3143528470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.