Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33817687›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

An international survey of healthcare workers use of personal protective equipment during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bory Kea, Alicia Johnson, Amber Lin, Jodi Lapidus, Jennifer N Cook, Calvin Choi, Bernard P Chang, Marc A Probst, Joel Park, Clare Atzema and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Preventive Measures among Healthcare Workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence and Health Outcomes ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Bory KeaCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency Medicine Portland Oregon USA.
Alicia JohnsonBiostatistics and Design Program Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health Portland Oregon USA.
Amber LinCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency Medicine Portland Oregon USA.
Jodi LapidusBiostatistics and Design Program Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health Portland Oregon USA.
Jennifer N CookCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency Medicine Portland Oregon USA.
Calvin ChoiCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness Research Oregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency Medicine Portland Oregon USA.
Bernard P ChangDepartment of Emergency Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA.
Marc A ProbstDepartment of Emergency Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA.
Joel ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Clare AtzemaSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, ICES and University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
Blanca Coll-VinentHospital Universitari Clinic Barcelona Spain.
Giorgio ConstantinoDipartimento di Medicina Interna, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy.
Dar'ya PozhidayevaOHSU Evaluation Core, Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Amy WilsonOHSU Evaluation Core, Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Adrienne ZellOHSU Evaluation Core, Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Matt HansenCenter for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine Oregon Health and Science University Department of Emergency Medicine Portland Oregon USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USCornell University · USFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHospital Universitari de Vic · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USOregon Clinic · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Practical Approaches to Care in Emergency Syncope (PACES)R01HL149680 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI PROBST, MARC · 2020 to 2024
$4.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known regarding the specific ways personal protective equipment (PPE) has been used and reused during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the patterns of PPE use and the impact of PPE availability on the attitudes and well-being of an international population of healthcare workers.

methodsThis was an online, cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers. The survey was disseminated internationally using social media, specialty society list-serves, and email augmented by snowball sampling to healthcare workers who provided direct care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The survey was conducted between April 13 and May 1, 2020. The primary outcome was self-reported PPE use during aerosol-generating medical procedures. Other outcomes included PPE use during care for respiratory patients in general, PPE reuse, PPE decontamination, and healthcare worker impressions related to their work and the pandemic.

resultsA total of 2227 healthcare workers from 23 countries completed the survey. The N95 was the most common respirator among the 1451 respondents who performed aerosol-generating procedures (n = 1050, 72.3%). Overall, 1783 (80.1%) of providers reported general reuse of PPE, which was similar across US regions but less common in Canada, Italy, and Spain. The most commonly reused item of PPE was the N95 respirator, with the majority of respondents who reused PPE reporting N95 reuse (n = 1157, 64.9%). Of the 1050 individuals who wore an N95 mask while performing an aerosol-generating medical procedure, 756 (72%) reported re-using an N95, and 344 (45.5%) reported reuse for >3 days. Qualitative results identified several common themes, including (1) lack of availability of PPE, (2) fear and anxiety as a result of inadequate PPE, (3) potential exposure to family members, and (4) concerns regarding workload and pay.

conclusionsThis international survey of healthcare workers found that N95 respirators were commonly used to care for patients with respiratory symptoms with and without aerosol-generating medical procedures. Healthcare workers reported an unprecedented need to reuse PPE that was designed for single-use, specifically the N95 respirator. The reuse of PPE increased the perceived risk for COVID-19 infection and harmed mental health.

Identifiers

PMID33817687
PMCPMC8002904
OpenAlexW3151529914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.