ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2021
Running Speed Estimation Using Shoe-Worn Inertial Sensors: Direct Integration, Linear, and Personalized Model.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postural stability during illusory self-motion-interactions of vision and touch.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- A 0.05 m Change in Inertial Measurement Unit Placement Alters Time and Frequency Domain Metrics during Running.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Unsupervised Gait Event Identification with a Single Wearable Accelerometer and/or Gyroscope: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Estimation of horizontal running power using foot-worn inertial measurement units.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Validity of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters in Healthy Young Adults Using a Motion-Sensor-Based Gait Analysis System (ORPHE ANALYTICS) during Walking and Running.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Ground Contact Times with Inertial Sensors in Elite 100-m Sprints under Competitive Field Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Limitations of Foot-Worn Sensors for Assessing Running Power.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The overground speed is a key component of running analysis. Today, most speed estimation wearable systems are based on GNSS technology. However, these devices can suffer from sparse communication with the satellites and have a high-power consumption. In this study, we propose three different approaches to estimate the overground speed in running based on foot-worn inertial sensors and compare the results against a reference GNSS system. First, a method is proposed by direct strapdown integration of the foot acceleration. Second, a feature-based linear model and finally a personalized online-model based on the recursive least squares' method were devised. We also evaluated the performance differences between two sets of features; one automatically selected set (i.e., optimized) and a set of features based on the existing literature. The data set of this study was recorded in a real-world setting, with 33 healthy individuals running at low, preferred, and high speed. The direct estimation of the running speed achieved an inter-subject mean ± STD accuracy of 0.08 ± 0.1 m/s and a precision of 0.16 ± 0.04 m/s. In comparison, the best feature-based linear model achieved 0.00 ± 0.11 m/s accuracy and 0.11 ± 0.05 m/s precision, while the personalized model obtained a 0.00 ± 0.01 m/s accuracy and 0.09 ± 0.06 m/s precision. The results of this study suggest that (1) the direct estimation of the velocity of the foot are biased, and the error is affected by the overground velocity and the slope; (2) the main limitation of a general linear model is the relatively high inter-subject variance of the bias, which reflects the intrinsic differences in gait patterns among individuals; (3) this inter-subject variance can be nulled using a personalized model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.