ReviewiScience2021
Fabrication and application of biocompatible nanogenerators.
Review in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the Ethereal Tightrope: The Nanogenerator Manipulates Neurons for Immune Equilibrium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- PVDF-Based Piezo-Catalytic Membranes-A Net-Zero Emission Approach towards Textile Wastewater Purification.Polymers · 2024Review
- Fish Scale for Wearable, Self-Powered TENG.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Energy-efficient electronics with an air-friction-driven rotating gate transistor using tribotronics.iScience · 2024Article
- Perspectives on recent advancements in energy harvesting, sensing and bio-medical applications of piezoelectric gels.Chemical Society reviews · 2023Review
- Fabrication of Advanced Cellulosic Triboelectric Materials via Dielectric Modulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Ag-Cellulose Hybrid Filler for Boosting the Power Output of a Triboelectric Nanogenerator.Polymers · 2023Article
- Li-Doped Bioactive Ceramics: Promising Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Significant Electromechanical Characteristic Enhancement of Coaxial Electrospinning Core-Shell Fibers.Polymers · 2022Article
- Hollow Filaments Synthesized by Dry-Jet Wet Spinning of Cellulose Nanofibrils: Structural Properties and Thermoregulation with Phase-Change Infills.ACS applied polymer materials · 2022Article
- New Polymeric Composites Based on Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2022Review
- A Stretchable and Self-Healing Hybrid Nano-Generator for Human Motion Monitoring.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a new sustainable energy source, ubiquitous mechanical energy has received great attention and was successfully harvested by different types of nanogenerators. Among them, biocompatible nanogenerators are of particular interests due to their potential for biomedical applications. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent achievements in the fabrication and application of biocompatible nanogenerators. The development process and working mechanism of nanogenerators are introduced. Different biocompatible materials for energy harvesting, such as amino acids, peptide, silk protein, and cellulose, are discussed and compared. We then discuss different applications of biocompatible nanogenerators. We conclude with the challenges and potential research directions in this emerging field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.