ArticleHealth science reports2021
Comparison of dipstick and quantitative tests for proteinuria and hematuria in middle-aged, male Japanese employees: A single-center study.
Article in Health science reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Genetic Modifiers Associated with the Development and/or Progression of Nephropathy in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic Concordance and Misclassification of Pre-Eclampsia in a Malaria-Endemic Setting: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Synergistic effect of proteinuria on dipstick hematuria-related decline in kidney function: The Japan Specific Health Checkups (J-SHC) Study.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2023Article
- Predictive System Implementation to Improve the Accuracy of Urine Self-Diagnosis with Smartphones: Application of a Confusion Matrix-Based Learning Model through RGB Semiquantitative Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of dipstick and quantitative tests for proteinuria and hematuria in middle-aged, male Japanese employees: A single-center study.Health science reports · 2021Article
- Nutritional Risk Factors in Albuminuria and Retinopathy in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Case Series Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe early and reliable detection of chronic kidney disease is important. In the present study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic results for proteinuria and hematuria between the dipstick test used in primary occupational health examinations and the quantitative tests used in more thorough examinations in clinics.
methodsWe conducted a single-center observational study of male staff (N = 573) at Kagoshima University who underwent a health examination in 2017. Both dipsticks and biochemical methods were used to assess proteinuria and hematuria.
resultsFor the dipstick test, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 55.6%, 92.4% and 10.4% for proteinuria, and 64.3%, 98.3% and 66.7% for hematuria, respectively. Four participants for whom false-negative results were obtained using dipsticks for proteinuria, and two of these had 3+ urinary glucose.
conclusionQualitative tests for proteinuria and hematuria had low sensitivities and positive predictive values. Therefore, for the early and reliable detection of chronic kidney disease, the use of quantitative urine tests should be considered during occupational health examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.