Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33817337›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2021

An assessment of annual procedure volumes and therapy adoption of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in four European countries.

Jan B Pietzsch, Benjamin P Geisler, Matthew J Daniels, Rachele M Busca, Giuseppe Tarantini, Lars Søndergaard, Scott E Kasner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan B PietzschWing Tech Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Benjamin P GeislerWing Tech Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1704-6067
Matthew J DanielsDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rachele M BuscaW.L. Gore & Associates, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe TarantiniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Lars SøndergaardThe Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Scott E KasnerDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatent foramen ovale closure reduces recurrence of cryptogenic ischaemic stroke compared to anti-platelet therapy. Our goal was to determine procedure volumes and closure utilisation as a proportion of candidates in four large European countries. PATIENTS AND

methodsNational statistics were obtained for Germany, England, France, and Italy for the last available five years (2014-2018). Eligibility was aligned to the enrolment criteria of pivotal trials and current consensus documents. Stroke and transient ischaemic attack incidences were obtained from epidemiological registries and claims data. The eligible candidate pool for analysis included current year candidates plus untreated patients from the prior two years. Absolute strokes avoided assumed the hazard ratio for ischaemic stroke recurrence from a recent meta-analysis.

resultsIn 2018, closure incidence rates were 5.64, 0.53, 2.94 and 5.26 per 100,000 in Germany, England, France and Italy, respectively. This reflects five-year increases of 128% in Germany, 462% in France and 36% in Italy ( DISCUSSION: Patent foramen ovale closure volumes increased after the 2017 announcement of positive trial results but still differ substantially across large European countries. If all closure candidates in 2018 with prior ischaemic stroke were treated, the resulting absolute reduction of recurrent ischaemic strokes, compared to anti-platelet therapy alone, would be between 782 and 2295 across the four countries over five years.

conclusionMany eligible patients at risk for a recurrent cryptogenic event might remain untreated due to regional practice variations.

Indexed as

cryptogenic strokeEquipment and Supplies Utilizationforamen ovaleHealth Services MisuseIschaemic strokePatentpatent foramen ovale closureProcedures and Techniques Utilizationunderutilization

Identifiers

PMID33817337
PMCPMC7995320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.