ArticleOpen life sciences2018
Soluble Myeloid Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cell 1 Might Have More Diagnostic Value for Bacterial Ascites than C-reactive Protein.
Article in Open life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timely and accurate diagnosis of ascites is of great significance for early treatment and prognostication. This study explored the value of soluble myeloid triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 1 (sTREM-1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for assessing ascites. A total of 133 patients with ascites who received treatment at the Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University between September 2015 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The ascites in 22, 45, 33 and 33 patients were tuberculous, bacterial, tumorous, and transudative, respectively. Healthy volunteers (n=30) who received a health examination at the same hospital during the same period constituted the control group. Before treatment, both ascitic sTREM-1 and CRP showed significant differences among the ascites subgroups (P<0.001), with the highest levels in the bacterial subgroup. Serum sTREM-1 and CRP also showed significant differences among the groups. A correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between sTREM-1 and CRP. ROC curves of the bacterial subgroup showed that when the optimal cutoff point was set to 20.2, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the serum sTREM-1 index were 0.933, 0.955, 0.914, and 0.965, respectively. sTREM-1 may provide more diagnostic value than CRP for the diagnosis of bacterial ascites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.