Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33817077›Full record

ArticleOpen life sciences2018

A New Combination of Substrates: Biogas Production and Diversity of the Methanogenic Microorganisms.

Ivan Kushkevych, Monika Vítězová, Tomáš Vítěz, Jozef Kováč, Petra Kaucká, Wojciech Jesionek, Milan Bartoš, Larry Barton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genes & diseases · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivan KushkevychDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Monika VítězováDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš VítězDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jozef KováčDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petra KauckáDepartment of Natural Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Wojciech JesionekInstitute of Biophysics of the CAS, Department of Plant Developmental Genetics, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milan BartošDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Larry BartonDepartment of Biology, Laboratory of Microbial Chemistry, University of New Mexico, New Mexico, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture, food industry, and manufacturing are just some of the areas where anaerobic technology can be used. Currently, anaerobic technologies are mainly used for wastewater treatment, solid waste treatment, or for the production of electrical and thermal energy from energy crops processing. However, a clear trend is towards more intensive use of this technology in biomass and biodegradable waste processing and hydrogen or biomethane production. An enormous number of anaerobic digesters are operating worldwide but there is very little information about the effect of different substrate combinations on the methanogens community. This is due to the fact that each of the anaerobic digesters has its own unique microbial community. For the most effective management of anaerobic processes it would be important to know the composition of a consortium of anaerobic microorganisms present in anaerobic digesters processing different input combinations of raw material. This paper characterizes the effect of the input raw materials on the diversity of the methanogen community. Two predominant microorganisms in anaerobic digesters were found to be 99% identity by the sequences of the 16S rRNA gene to the

Indexed as

anaerobic digestersArchaeabiogasmethane productionmethanogenic microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID33817077
PMCPMC7874741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.