ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021
An efficient approach for low latency processing in stream data.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the integration of Esper complex event processing engine and message brokers.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Comparative Approach of Tracking COVID-19 in Balkan Countries Using Interactive Web-Based Dashboard.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stream data is the data that is generated continuously from the different data sources and ideally defined as the data that has no discrete beginning or end. Processing the stream data is a part of big data analytics that aims at querying the continuously arriving data and extracting meaningful information from the stream. Although earlier processing of such stream was using batch analytics, nowadays there are applications like the stock market, patient monitoring, and traffic analysis which can cause a drastic difference in processing, if the output is generated in levels of hours and minutes. The primary goal of any real-time stream processing system is to process the stream data as soon as it arrives. Correspondingly, analytics of the stream data also needs consideration of surrounding dependent data. For example, stock market analytics results are often useless if we do not consider their associated or dependent parameters which affect the result. In a real-world application, these dependent stream data usually arrive from the distributed environment. Hence, the stream processing system has to be designed, which can deal with the delay in the arrival of such data from distributed sources. We have designed the stream processing model which can deal with all the possible latency and provide an end-to-end low latency system. We have performed the stock market prediction by considering affecting parameters, such as USD, OIL Price, and Gold Price with an equal arrival rate. We have calculated the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) which simplifies the comparison among models with different scales. A comparative analysis of the experiment presented in the report shows a significant improvement in the result when considering the affecting parameters. In this work, we have used the statistical approach to forecast the probability of possible data latency arrives from distributed sources. Moreover, we have performed preprocessing of stream data to ensure at-least-once delivery semantics. In the direction towards providing low latency in processing, we have also implemented exactly-once processing semantics. Extensive experiments have been performed with varying sizes of the window and data arrival rate. We have concluded that system latency can be reduced when the window size is equal to the data arrival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.