Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33817026›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021

The classification of movement intention through machine learning models: the identification of significant time-domain EMG features.

Ismail Mohd Khairuddin, Shahrul Naim Sidek, Anwar P P Abdul Majeed, Mohd Azraai Mohd Razman, Asmarani Ahmad Puzi, Hazlina Md Yusof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ismail Mohd KhairuddinFaculty of Manufacturing & Mechatronics Engineering Technology, Innovative Manufacturing, Mechatronics and Sports Laboratory, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6969-9062
Shahrul Naim SidekDepartment of Mechatronics, Kulliyyah of Engineering, Biomechatronics Research Laboratory, International Islamic University, Gombak, Selangor, Malaysia.
Anwar P P Abdul MajeedFaculty of Manufacturing & Mechatronics Engineering Technology, Innovative Manufacturing, Mechatronics and Sports Laboratory, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-5596
Mohd Azraai Mohd RazmanFaculty of Manufacturing & Mechatronics Engineering Technology, Innovative Manufacturing, Mechatronics and Sports Laboratory, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia.
Asmarani Ahmad PuziDepartment of Mechatronics, Kulliyyah of Engineering, Biomechatronics Research Laboratory, International Islamic University, Gombak, Selangor, Malaysia.
Hazlina Md YusofDepartment of Mechatronics, Kulliyyah of Engineering, Biomechatronics Research Laboratory, International Islamic University, Gombak, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-2028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG) signal is one of the extensively utilised biological signals for predicting human motor intention, which is an essential element in human-robot collaboration platforms. Studies on motion intention prediction from EMG signals have often been concentrated on either classification and regression models of muscle activity. In this study, we leverage the information from the EMG signals, to detect the subject's intentions in generating motion commands for a robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation platform. The EMG signals are recorded from ten healthy subjects' biceps muscle, and the movements of the upper limb evaluated are voluntary elbow flexion and extension along the sagittal plane. The signals are filtered through a fifth-order Butterworth filter. A number of features were extracted from the filtered signals namely waveform length (WL), mean absolute value (MAV), root mean square (RMS), standard deviation (SD), minimum (MIN) and maximum (MAX). Several different classifiers viz. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN) were investigated on its efficacy to accurately classify the pre-intention and intention classes based on the significant features identified (MIN and MAX) via Extremely Randomised Tree feature selection technique. It was observed from the present investigation that the DT classifier yielded an excellent classification with a classification accuracy of 100%, 99% and 99% on training, testing and validation dataset, respectively based on the identified features. The findings of the present investigation are non-trivial towards facilitating the rehabilitation phase of patients based on their actual capability and hence, would eventually yield a more active participation from them.

Indexed as

ClassificationEMGFeature extractionMachine learningMovement intention

Identifiers

PMID33817026
PMCPMC7959624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.