Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33817002›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021

Detecting cassava mosaic disease using a deep residual convolutional neural network with distinct block processing.

David Opeoluwa Oyewola, Emmanuel Gbenga Dada, Sanjay Misra, Robertas Damaševičius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improved AlexNet with Inception-V4 for Plant Disease Diagnosis.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Opeoluwa OyewolaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Federal University Kashere, Gombe, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Gbenga DadaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-5447
Sanjay MisraDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-9331
Robertas DamaševičiusDepartment of Applied Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-9990-1084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For people in developing countries, cassava is a major source of calories and carbohydrates. However, Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD) has become a major cause of concern among farmers in sub-Saharan Africa countries, which rely on cassava for both business and local consumption. The article proposes a novel deep residual convolution neural network (DRNN) for CMD detection in cassava leaf images. With the aid of distinct block processing, we can counterbalance the imbalanced image dataset of the cassava diseases and increase the number of images available for training and testing. Moreover, we adjust low contrast using Gamma correction and decorrelation stretching to enhance the color separation of an image with significant band-to-band correlation. Experimental results demonstrate that using a balanced dataset of images increases the accuracy of classification. The proposed DRNN model outperforms the plain convolutional neural network (PCNN) by a significant margin of 9.25% on the Cassava Disease Dataset from Kaggle.

Indexed as

Cassava diseaseConvolutional neural networksData augmentationDeep learningDistinct block processingImage processingPattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID33817002
PMCPMC7959600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.