ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2020
Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- EmoAtlas: An emotional network analyzer of texts that merges psychological lexicons, artificial intelligence, and network science.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Narratives from GPT-derived networks of news and a link to financial markets dislocations.International journal of data science and analytics · 2025Article
- Cognitive networks detect structural patterns and emotional complexity in suicide notes.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Revealing semantic and emotional structure of suicide notes with cognitive network science.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Cognitive Networks for Knowledge Modeling: A Gentle Introduction for Data- and Cognitive Scientists.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mindset reconstruction maps how individuals structure and perceive knowledge, a map unfolded here by investigating language and its cognitive reflection in the human mind, i.e., the mental lexicon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.