Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816932›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2020

Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case.

Remzi Celebi, Joao Rebelo Moreira, Ahmed A Hassan, Sandeep Ayyar, Lars Ridder, Tobias Kuhn, Michel Dumontier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. MGATRx: Discovering Drug Repositioning Candidates Using Multi-View Graph Attention.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Remzi Celebi *Institute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Joao Rebelo Moreira *Computer Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ahmed A HassanPharmacology & Personalised Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sandeep AyyarMedical Informatics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
Lars RidderNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tobias KuhnComputer Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michel DumontierInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential for the advancement of science that researchers share, reuse and reproduce each other's workflows and protocols. The FAIR principles are a set of guidelines that aim to maximize the value and usefulness of research data, and emphasize the importance of making digital objects findable and reusable by others. The question of how to apply these principles not just to data but also to the workflows and protocols that consume and produce them is still under debate and poses a number of challenges. In this paper we describe a two-fold approach of simultaneously applying the FAIR principles to scientific workflows as well as the involved data. We apply and evaluate our approach on the case of the PREDICT workflow, a highly cited drug repurposing workflow. This includes FAIRification of the involved datasets, as well as applying semantic technologies to represent and store data about the detailed versions of the general protocol, of the concrete workflow instructions, and of their execution traces. We propose a semantic model to address these specific requirements and was evaluated by answering competency questions. This semantic model consists of classes and relations from a number of existing ontologies, including Workflow4ever, PROV, EDAM, and BPMN. This allowed us then to formulate and answer new kinds of competency questions. Our evaluation shows the high degree to which our FAIRified OpenPREDICT workflow now adheres to the FAIR principles and the practicality and usefulness of being able to answer our new competency questions.

Indexed as

Drug repurposingFAIR data principlesFAIR workflowsOntology-driven healthcareReproducibilityResearch ObjectScientific workflows and protocolsSemantic web

Identifiers

PMID33816932
PMCPMC7924452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.