ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2020
Genome annotation across species using deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- DRANetSplicer: A Splice Site Prediction Model Based on Deep Residual Attention Networks.Genes · 2024Article
- Identification of DNA motif pairs on paired sequences based on composite heterogeneous graph.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Navigating the archaeal frontier: insights and projections from bioinformatic pipelines.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence: A Promising Tool in Exploring the Phytomicrobiome in Managing Disease and Promoting Plant Health.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genomics enters the deep learning era.PeerJ · 2022Review
- Spliceator: multi-species splice site prediction using convolutional neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- ReFeaFi: Genome-wide prediction of regulatory elements driving transcription initiation.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Opportunities and challenges for the computational interpretation of rare variation in clinically important genes.American journal of human genetics · 2021Review
- Application of Deep Learning in Plant-Microbiota Association Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Systems biology approaches integrated with artificial intelligence for optimized metabolic engineering.Metabolic engineering communications · 2020Review
- A primer on deep learning in genomics.Nature genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of deep neural network is a rapidly expanding field now reaching many disciplines including genomics. In particular, convolutional neural networks have been exploited for identifying the functional role of short genomic sequences. These approaches rely on gathering large sets of sequences with known functional role, extracting those sequences from whole-genome-annotations. These sets are then split into learning, test and validation sets in order to train the networks. While the obtained networks perform well on validation sets, they often perform poorly when applied on whole genomes in which the ratio of positive over negative examples can be very different than in the training set. We here address this issue by assessing the genome-wide performance of networks trained with sets exhibiting different ratios of positive to negative examples. As a case study, we use sequences encompassing gene starts from the RefGene database as positive examples and random genomic sequences as negative examples. We then demonstrate that models trained using data from one organism can be used to predict gene-start sites in a related species, when using training sets providing good genome-wide performance. This cross-species application of convolutional neural networks provides a new way to annotate any genome from existing high-quality annotations in a related reference species. It also provides a way to determine whether the sequence motifs recognised by chromatin-associated proteins in different species are conserved or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.