Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816886›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2019

Computational methods for the ab initio identification of novel microRNA in plants: a systematic review.

Buwani Manuweera, Gillian Reynolds, Indika Kahanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Buwani ManuweeraGianforte School of Computing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States of America.
Gillian ReynoldsGianforte School of Computing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States of America.
Indika KahandaGianforte School of Computing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a vital role as post-transcriptional regulators in gene expression. Experimental determination of miRNA sequence and structure is both expensive and time consuming. The next-generation sequencing revolution, which facilitated the rapid accumulation of biological data has brought biology into the "big data" domain. As such, developing computational methods to predict miRNAs has become an active area of inter-disciplinary research.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review is to focus on the developments of ab initio plant miRNA identification methods over the last decade. DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched for relevant articles, according to a well-defined review protocol. STUDY SELECTION: The search results were further filtered using the selection criteria that only included studies on novel plant miRNA identification using machine learning. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data from each study were extracted in order to carry out an analysis on their methodologies and findings.

resultsResults depict that in the last decade, there were 20 articles published on novel miRNA identification methods in plants of which only 11 of them were primarily focused on plant microRNA identification. Our findings suggest a need for more stringent plant-focused miRNA identification studies.

conclusionOverall, the study accuracies are of a satisfactory level, although they may generate a considerable number of false negatives. In future, attention must be paid to the biological plausibility of computationally identified miRNAs to prevent further propagation of biologically questionable miRNA sequences.

Indexed as

ab initioMachine learningmicroRNAPlantSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33816886
PMCPMC7924660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.