Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816841›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2019

Improving rule-based classification using Harmony Search.

Hesam Hasanpour, Ramak Ghavamizadeh Meibodi, Keivan Navi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hesam HasanpourDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Ramak Ghavamizadeh MeibodiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Keivan NaviDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification and associative rule mining are two substantial areas in data mining. Some scientists attempt to integrate these two field called rule-based classifiers. Rule-based classifiers can play a very important role in applications such as fraud detection, medical diagnosis, etc. Numerous previous studies have shown that this type of classifier achieves a higher classification accuracy than traditional classification algorithms. However, they still suffer from a fundamental limitation. Many rule-based classifiers used various greedy techniques to prune the redundant rules that lead to missing some important rules. Another challenge that must be considered is related to the enormous set of mined rules that result in high processing overhead. The result of these approaches is that the final selected rules may not be the global best rules. These algorithms are not successful at exploiting search space effectively in order to select the best subset of candidate rules. We merged the Apriori algorithm, Harmony Search, and classification-based association rules (CBA) algorithm in order to build a rule-based classifier. We applied a modified version of the Apriori algorithm with multiple minimum support for extracting useful rules for each class in the dataset. Instead of using a large number of candidate rules, binary Harmony Search was utilized for selecting the best subset of rules that appropriate for building a classification model. We applied the proposed method on a seventeen benchmark dataset and compared its result with traditional association rule classification algorithms. The statistical results show that our proposed method outperformed other rule-based approaches.

Indexed as

Apriori algorithmCBA algorithmHarmony Search

Identifiers

PMID33816841
PMCPMC7924428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.