ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2019
A rotation and translation invariant method for 3D organ image classification using deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survey of methods and principles in three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional medical images.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023Review
- Distribution-preserving data augmentation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) medical image classification is useful in applications such as disease diagnosis and content-based medical image retrieval. It is a challenging task due to several reasons. First, image intensity values are vastly different depending on the image modality. Second, intensity values within the same image modality may vary depending on the imaging machine and artifacts may also be introduced in the imaging process. Third, processing 3D data requires high computational power. In recent years, significant research has been conducted in the field of 3D medical image classification. However, most of these make assumptions about patient orientation and imaging direction to simplify the problem and/or work with the full 3D images. As such, they perform poorly when these assumptions are not met. In this paper, we propose a method of classification for 3D organ images that is rotation and translation invariant. To this end, we extract a representative two-dimensional (2D) slice along the plane of best symmetry from the 3D image. We then use this slice to represent the 3D image and use a 20-layer deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to perform the classification task. We show experimentally, using multi-modal data, that our method is comparable to existing methods when the assumptions of patient orientation and viewing direction are met. Notably, it shows similarly high accuracy even when these assumptions are violated, where other methods fail. We also explore how this method can be used with other DCNN models as well as conventional classification approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.