Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816812›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2018

Temporal constrained objects for modelling neuronal dynamics.

Manjusha Nair, Jinesh Manchan Kannimoola, Bharat Jayaraman, Bipin Nair, Shyam Diwakar

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manjusha NairAmrita School of Biotechnology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Jinesh Manchan KannimoolaCenter for Cybersecurity Systems and Networks, Amritapuri Campus, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5392-0570
Bharat JayaramanDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Bipin NairAmrita School of Biotechnology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Shyam DiwakarAmrita School of Biotechnology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-0184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral new programming languages and technologies have emerged in the past few decades in order to ease the task of modelling complex systems. Modelling the dynamics of complex systems requires various levels of abstractions and reductive measures in representing the underlying behaviour. This also often requires making a trade-off between how realistic a model should be in order to address the scientific questions of interest and the computational tractability of the model.

methodsIn this paper, we propose a novel programming paradigm, called

resultsWe identified the feasibility and practicality in automatically mapping different kinds of neuron and synapse models to the constraints of DISCUSSION:

Indexed as

Constraint programmingDeclarative modellingNeuron modelsObject-oriented languagesTemporal constrained objects

Identifiers

PMID33816812
PMCPMC7924700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.