Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816789›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021

Feedback Focused: A Learner- and Teacher-Centered Curriculum to Improve the Feedback Exchange in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.

Natasha R Johnson, Andrea Pelletier, Celeste Royce, Ilona Goldfarb, Tara Singh, Treven C Lau, Deborah D Bartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current practices in caesarean section training: A cross-sectional study comparing high- and low-middle-income countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natasha R JohnsonClerkship Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Andrea PelletierStatistician, Department of Obstetrics and Genecology, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-3063-2968
Celeste RoyceClerkship Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School/Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital.ORCID 0000-0002-0739-0174
Ilona GoldfarbAssociate Clerkship Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital.
Tara SinghClerkship Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School/Cambridge Health Alliance.
Treven C LauClerkship Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital.
Deborah D BartzAssociate Clerkship Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Learners consistently report insufficient feedback, despite interventions to improve the quantity and quality of feedback. Effective feedback requires a dynamic partnership and a trusting relationship between students and teachers. Methods: We developed and implemented a faculty and student program called Feedback Focused on the OB/GYN clerkship with learner- and faculty-centered teaching materials. We evaluated the curriculum's impact on the frequency and quality of feedback exchange through comparison of end-of-clerkship evaluations before and after implementing the Feedback Focused program and assessed student satisfaction from written responses on clerkship evaluations. Results: A total of 1,912 feedback folio entries were recorded during the curriculum timeframe, representing an average of 19 entries per student. Of students, 85% turned in their feedback folios at the end of the clerkship. There was a marked increase in reported frequency of feedback with the initiative, with 28% of students reporting receiving feedback four or more times per month before the start of our program, compared to 64% after its completion. The percentage of students who reported faculty provided direction and constructive feedback Discussion: We successfully developed and implemented a multipronged approach to effectively change the learning environment culture within our OB/GYN clerkship program. Our evaluation demonstrated that the Feedback Focused program was well received and increased frequency of feedback.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipFeedbackGynecologyObstetricsCurriculumFemaleHumansPregnancyDual InvestmentFaculty DevelopmentFeedbackFormative FeedbackLearner Training

Identifiers

PMID33816789
PMCPMC8015633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.