Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816767›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2021

Congestive heart failure model representing aortic banding induced hypertrophy: A study to analyse extent of pressure overload and alteration in myocardial structure and function.

Arti Patel, Darshna Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent highlights on the mechanistic basis of cardiovascular remodeling from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arti PatelS. K. Patel College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana 382711, Gujarat, India.
Darshna PatelDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad 380009, Gujarat, India.
Ganpat University · INGujarat University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congestive Heart failure (CHF) is a severe pathology representing a major public health problem in industrialized nations which is increasing in prevalence and incidence. The aortic banding rat model provides steady progression of cardiac dysfunction under chronic pressure overload. Present study evaluated two abdominal aortic constriction techniques including constriction of aorta above renal arteries and between renal arteries. The extent of constriction was varied with 22 G and 24 G needles and the duration for evaluation of CHF was also varied by terminating the banded animals after 6 and 8 weeks of banding. Various hemodynamic, ECG and tissue parameters were evaluated after banding to see the progression of CHF. The findings revealed that the constriction of the aorta above both renal arteries with 24 G needle is a better technique amongst other tested banding techniques as the rate of progression of CHF was found to be maximum with it. On the basis of above study, it was concluded that, aortic banding above both renal arteries with 24 G needle is a better technique for induction of pressure overload and for further observation in transition of the cardiac compensatory to decompensatory phase, the duration of the model needs to be prolonged.

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic bandingCardiac functionCongestive heart failureLV hypertrophyMyocardial function

Identifiers

PMID33816767
PMCPMC8008182
OpenAlexW3138752260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.