Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

The Isolation and Replication of African Swine Fever Virus in Primary Renal-Derived Swine Macrophages.

Taehwan Oh, Duy Tien Do, Hung Van Vo, Hyeok-Il Kwon, Seung-Chul Lee, Min Ho Kim, Dung Thi Thu Nguyen, Quang Tin Vinh Le, Tan Minh Tran, Toan Tat Nguyen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taehwan OhDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Duy Tien DoFaculty of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hung Van VoDepartment of Animal Health, Center for Veterinary Diagnostics, Regional Animal Health Office No. 6, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hyeok-Il KwonChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories, Daejeon, South Korea.
Seung-Chul LeeChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories, Daejeon, South Korea.
Min Ho KimChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories, Daejeon, South Korea.
Dung Thi Thu NguyenFaculty of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Quang Tin Vinh LeDepartment of Animal Health, Center for Veterinary Diagnostics, Regional Animal Health Office No. 6, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tan Minh TranDepartment of Animal Health, Center for Veterinary Diagnostics, Regional Animal Health Office No. 6, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Toan Tat NguyenFaculty of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Joo Young LeeChoongAng Vaccine Laboratories, Daejeon, South Korea.
Chanhee ChaeDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
CHA Vaccine Institute (South Korea) · KRNong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City · VNSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs by replicating mainly in monocyte/macrophage lineages. Various primary cells including pulmonary alveolar macrophages have been used for the propagation of ASFV on this account. However, ethical constraints and consistency problems exist as it is necessary to harvest same phenotype of primary cells in order to continue a study. We suggested renal-derived swine macrophages as a novel primary cell candidate to address these issues. These primary cells proved to be permissive to both cell adapted ASFV and a wild-type ASFV. Compared to the commercial cell line MA-104, the renal-derived macrophages were more suitable to isolate the field virus. The consistent molecular characteristics of the renal-derived macrophages were demonstrated by immunocytochemistry with antibodies against macrophage cell surface markers including CD163, CD172a, and Iba-1. Viral protein p30 and p72 expression in ASFV infected macrophages was confirmed by immunocytochemistry by use of specific monoclonal antibodies. We observed increase of cell-free viral DNA and infectious virus titer in infected cell supernatant in successive days-post-infection. These results demonstrated that primary renal-derived swine macrophages are useful for ASFV isolation and propagation in terms of cell phenotypes, susceptibility to the virus, and virus production.

Indexed as

African swine fevermolecular chacterizationrenal-derived macrophagesvirus isolationvirus replication

Identifiers

PMID33816588
PMCPMC8017199
OpenAlexW3139138850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.