Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816520›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2021

Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Li Zou, Qiao Zong, Wenning Fu, Zeyu Zhang, Hongbin Xu, Shijiao Yan, Jin Mao, Yan Zhang, Shiyi Cao, Chuanzhu Lv

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pollution and coronary risk: how much does it matter?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Li ZouDepartment of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qiao ZongSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wenning FuSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zeyu ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hongbin XuSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shijiao YanDepartment of Neurology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Jin MaoSchool of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yan ZhangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shiyi CaoSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chuanzhu LvKey Laboratory of Emergency and Trauma, Ministry of Education, College of Emergency and Trauma, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNHubei University of Medicine · CNHainan Medical University · CNRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

air pollutionmeta-analysismyocardial infarctionparticulate matterPM10PM2.5 (AQI)

Identifiers

PMID33816520
PMCPMC8010182
OpenAlexW3117531522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.