ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in the Breath of COVID-19 Patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A study of 9 common breath VOCs in 504 healthy subjects using PTR-TOF-MS.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024Article
- Advancements in Airborne Viral Nucleic Acid Detection with Wearable Devices.Advanced sensor research · 2024Article
- COVID-19: An overview on possible transmission ways, sampling matrices and diagnosis.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Review
- At the crossroads of epidemiology and biology: Bridging the gap between SARS-CoV-2 viral strain properties and epidemic wave characteristics.Biochimie · 2023Review
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in exhaled breath and its potential for prevention measures.Infection prevention in practice · 2023Article
- Oxylipin concentration shift in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.Journal of breath research · 2023Article
- BIS-guided sedation prevents the cough reaction of patients under general anaesthesia caused by extubation: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2023Article
- Evaluation of droplet digital qRT-PCR (dd qRT-PCR) for quantification of SARS CoV-2 RNA in stool and urine specimens of COVID-19 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Potential Use of Exhaled Breath Condensate for Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled breath from non-hospitalized COVID-19-infected individuals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Aluminium Gauze Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Non-Woven Masks Worn by Patients with COVID-19.Infectious disease reports · 2022Article
- Review of non-invasive detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens in exhaled breath condensate.Journal of breath research · 2022Review
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by exhaled breath spectral analysis: Introducing a ready-to-use point-of-care mass screening method.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Bivalve Mollusks by Droplet Digital RT-PCR (dd RT-PCR).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- One-Step, Wash-free, Nanoparticle Clustering-Based Magnetic Particle Spectroscopy Bioassay Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Nucleocapsid Proteins in the Liquid Phase.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
- Label-free SARS-CoV-2 detection and classification using phase imaging with computational specificity.Light, science & applications · 2021Article
- A comprehensive review on current COVID-19 detection methods: From lab care to point of care diagnosis.Sensors international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the COVID-19 outbreak year 2020, a consensus was reached on the fact that SARS-CoV-2 spreads through aerosols. However, finding an efficient method to detect viruses in aerosols to monitor the risk of similar infections and enact effective control remains a great challenge. Our study aimed to build a swirling aerosol collection (SAC) device to collect viral particles in exhaled breath and subsequently detect SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Laboratory tests of the SAC device using aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus indicated that the SAC device can produce a positive result in only 10 s, with a collection distance to the source of 10 cm in a biosafety chamber, when the release rate of the pseudovirus source was 1,000,000 copies/h. Subsequent clinical trials of the device showed three positives and 14 negatives out of 27 patients in agreement with pharyngeal swabs, and 10 patients obtained opposite results, while no positive results were found in a healthy control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.