Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816455›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Nanofiber-Based Delivery of Bioactive Lipids Promotes Pro-regenerative Inflammation and Enhances Muscle Fiber Growth After Volumetric Muscle Loss.

Cheryl L San Emeterio, Lauren A Hymel, Thomas C Turner, Molly E Ogle, Emily G Pendleton, William Y York, Claire E Olingy, Alan Y Liu, Hong Seo Lim, Todd A Sulchek and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tissue Engineered 3D Constructs for Volumetric Muscle Loss.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl L San EmeterioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Lauren A HymelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Thomas C TurnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Molly E OgleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emily G PendletonRegenerative Bioscience Center, Rhodes Center for ADS, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
William Y YorkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Claire E OlingyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Alan Y LiuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Hong Seo LimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Todd A SulchekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Gordon L WarrenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Luke J MortensenRegenerative Bioscience Center, Rhodes Center for ADS, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Peng QiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Young C JangPetit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Nick J WillettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Edward A BotchweyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Georgia · USEmory University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
Immune Modulatory Nanofibers for Skeletal Muscle ReconstructionR56AR071708 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOTCHWEY, EDWARD A. · 2017 to 2018
$789k
Regenerative Immunotherapy using light triggered in vivo activation of adhesive peptidesR56DE029703 · NIDCR · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOTCHWEY, EDWARD A., GARCIA, ANDRES J · 2020 to 2020
$430k
NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR071708NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE029703NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries after extremity trauma results in an important clinical challenge often associated with impaired healing, significant fibrosis, and long-term pain and functional deficits. While acute muscle injuries typically display a remarkable capacity for regeneration, critically sized VML defects present a dysregulated immune microenvironment which overwhelms innate repair mechanisms leading to chronic inflammation and pro-fibrotic signaling. In this series of studies, we developed an immunomodulatory biomaterial therapy to locally modulate the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling axis and resolve the persistent pro-inflammatory injury niche plaguing a critically sized VML defect. Multiparameter pseudo-temporal 2D projections of single cell cytometry data revealed subtle distinctions in the altered dynamics of specific immune subpopulations infiltrating the defect that were critical to muscle regeneration. We show that S1P receptor modulation via nanofiber delivery of Fingolimod (FTY720) was characterized by increased numbers of pro-regenerative immune subsets and coincided with an enriched pool of muscle stem cells (MuSCs) within the injured tissue. This FTY720-induced priming of the local injury milieu resulted in increased myofiber diameter and alignment across the defect space followed by enhanced revascularization and reinnervation of the injured muscle. These findings indicate that localized modulation of S1P receptor signaling via nanofiber scaffolds, which resemble the native extracellular matrix ablated upon injury, provides great potential as an immunotherapy for bolstering endogenous mechanisms of regeneration following VML injury.

Indexed as

immunomodulationinflammationregenerationsphingolipidtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33816455
PMCPMC8017294
OpenAlexW3137881740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.