Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816391›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2020

Characterization of the Cognitive and Motor Changes Revealed by the Elevated Plus Maze in an Experimental Rat Model of Radiation-Induced Brain Injury.

Alfred K Njamnshi, Nene Ahidjo, Leonard Ngarka, Leonard N Nfor, Michel K Mengnjo, Wepnyu Y Njamnshi, Jonas Guy Basseguin Atchou, Godwin Y Tatah, Louis M Mbaku, Faustin Dong À Zok and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Eluate of the Medicinal PlantEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  5. Brain communications · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alfred K NjamnshiDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Nene AhidjoDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Leonard NgarkaDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Leonard N NforDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Michel K MengnjoDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Wepnyu Y NjamnshiDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Jonas Guy Basseguin AtchouDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Godwin Y TatahDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Louis M MbakuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Ministry of Livestock, Fisheries and Animal Industries, Garoua, Cameroon.
Faustin Dong À ZokDepartment of Radiotherapy, Yaoundé General Hospital, Yaoundé, Garoua, Cameroon.
Paul F Seke EtetDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Research Africa Initiative (BRAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Université de Yaoundé I · CMCentral Hospital of Yaoundé · CMSouth African Brain Research Institute · ZAInstitute for Sustainable Development · ETMinistry of Livestock, Fisheries and Animal Industries · CMYaoundé General Hospital · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperimental models are needed to better understand the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases to develop novel therapeutics. The neuropathology and clinical signs of acute radiation syndrome resemble those of neurodegenerative conditions. We characterized elevated plus maze (EPM) indicators of cognitive and motor impairment in rats exposed to brain-damaging doses of gamma radiation to develop a model for neurological component of the acute radiation syndrome. MATERIALS AND

methodsTechnetium 99 m was administered once through tail vein to male Wistar rats to reach an absorbed dose of Gamma radiation of 667 mGy (66.7Rad). Animal performance in the EPM was assessed every 14 days. Rats were observed for 9 weeks for the occurrence of systemic and neurological signs. Comparisons were done between irradiated and nonirradiated rats, and in each group with baseline performance.

resultsEPM indicators of cognitive and motor impairment, anxiety, and depression were observed concomitantly and increased with the severity of acute radiation syndrome-like systemic and neurological signs. Alterations in EPM indicators appeared 3 weeks postirradiation and their severity increased with time. Notably, arm transitions and the distance covered in the maze were decreased (-56.71% and -73.62%,

conclusionsOur results suggest that irradiated rat performance in the EPM paradigm reflects disease severity and could be used to perform both acute and subchronic pharmacological studies in acute radiation syndrome-like diseases in rats.

Indexed as

acute radiation syndromeAnxietycognitive dysfunctiondepressionelevated plus mazegamma raysrats

Identifiers

PMID33816391
PMCPMC8012866
OpenAlexW3108401049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.