Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816175›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

An efficient deep convolutional neural network model for visual localization and automatic diagnosis of thyroid nodules on ultrasound images.

Jialin Zhu, Sheng Zhang, Ruiguo Yu, Zhiqiang Liu, Hongyan Gao, Bing Yue, Xun Liu, Xiangqian Zheng, Ming Gao, Xi Wei

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jialin ZhuDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasonography, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Sheng ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasonography, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Ruiguo YuCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Networking, Tianjin, China.
Zhiqiang LiuCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Networking, Tianjin, China.
Hongyan GaoTianjin Xiqing District Women and Children's Health and Family Planning Service Center, Tianjin, China.
Bing YueDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasonography, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Xun LiuDepartment of Ultrasonography, the Fifth Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.
Xiangqian ZhengDepartment of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Ming GaoDepartment of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Xi WeiDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasonography, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNTianjin University · CNFifth Tianjin Central Hospital · CNTianjin Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to construct a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model for localization and diagnosis of thyroid nodules on ultrasound and evaluate its diagnostic performance.

methodsWe developed and trained a deep CNN model called the Brief Efficient Thyroid Network (BETNET) using 16,401 ultrasound images. According to the parameters of the model, we developed a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to localize and differentiate thyroid nodules. The validation dataset (1,000 images) was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the model using three state-of-the-art algorithms. We used an internal test set (300 images) to evaluate the BETNET model by comparing it with diagnoses from five radiologists with varying degrees of experience in thyroid nodule diagnosis. Lastly, we demonstrated the general applicability of our artificial intelligence (AI) system for diagnosing thyroid cancer in an external test set (1,032 images).

resultsThe BETNET model accurately detected thyroid nodules in visualization experiments. The model demonstrated higher values for area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve [0.983, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.973-0.990], sensitivity (99.19%), accuracy (98.30%), and Youden index (0.9663) than the three state-of-the-art algorithms (P<0.05). In the internal test dataset, the diagnostic accuracy of the BETNET model was 91.33%, which was markedly higher than the accuracy of one experienced (85.67%) and two less experienced radiologists (77.67% and 69.33%). The area under the ROC curve of the BETNET model (0.951) was similar to that of the two highly skilled radiologists (0.940 and 0.953) and significantly higher than that of one experienced and two less experienced radiologists (P<0.01). The kappa coefficient of the BETNET model and the pathology results showed good agreement (0.769). In addition, the BETNET model achieved an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC =0.970, 95% CI: 0.958-0.980) when applied to ultrasound images from another independent hospital.

conclusionsWe developed a deep learning model which could accurately locate and automatically diagnose thyroid nodules on ultrasound images. The BETNET model exhibited better diagnostic performance than three state-of-the-art algorithms, which in turn performed similarly in diagnosis as the experienced radiologists. The BETNET model has the potential to be applied to ultrasound images from other hospitals.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)deep convolutional neural network (deep CNN)localizationThyroid noduleultrasound diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID33816175
PMCPMC7930675
OpenAlexW3109216387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.