Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816171›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Feasibility study for

Ulf Titze, Torsten Hansen, Barbara Titze, Birte Schulz, Alfons Gunnemann, Bernardo Rocco, Karl-Dietrich Sievert

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulf TitzeDepartment of Pathology, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Torsten HansenDepartment of Pathology, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Barbara TitzeDepartment of Pathology, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Birte SchulzDepartment of Pathology, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Alfons GunnemannDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Bernardo RoccoDepartment of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Karl-Dietrich SievertDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Klinikum Lippe · DEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a novel micro-imaging technique providing optical sections of examined tissue. The method has been well established for the diagnosis of tumours in dermatological specimens. Preliminary results found good feasibility when this technique was used to examine prostate cancer (PCa) specimens.

methodsWe report on the application of FCM in magnet resonance imaging (MRI)-fused prostate biopsies (10 patients, total number of biopsy specimens: n=121) and compare the results to conventional histology.

resultsSpecific structures of the prostatic tissue were very well represented in the FCM images comparable to conventional histology. Prostate carcinoma was diagnosed with good sensitivity (79/68%) and high specificity (100%) by two pathologists with substantial/almost perfect levels of agreement with the results of conventional histology (kappa 0.79/0.86). Depending on the quality of the scans, malignant lesions of 1.8 mm and more in diameter were reliably diagnosed. Smaller lesions were rated as suspect for malignancy, but could not be consistently differentiated from reactive changes. Optimal image qualities were achieved in focus depths of up to 50 µm, whereas deeper scans led to insufficient representation of cytological features. Pre-treatment with acridine orange (AO) did not alter immunoreactivity of the tissue or its feasibility for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses and adequate amounts of DNA could be extracted for further polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based examinations.

conclusionsFCM seems to be a promising tool for the timely diagnosis in cases of PCa in patients requiring therapy. In particular, this technique is a material-sparing method that conserves the biopsies as unfixed material for further analysis such as molecular tumour companion diagnosis.

Indexed as

Confocal microscopydigital pathologyprostate biopsiesprostate cancer (PCa)

Identifiers

PMID33816171
PMCPMC7930678
OpenAlexW3122561446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.