ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
A practical study of the hepatic vascular system anatomy of the caudate lobe.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical study of the paracaval branch of the caudate lobe: implications of paracaval portion-preserving right hepatectomy for donors with marginal remnant liver volume.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Technical advances and application strategies in anatomical hepatic resection based on Laennec's capsule.iLIVER · 2025Review
- Short-term and Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Combined Caudate Lobectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Involving the Hepatic Hilus: A Propensity Score Analysis.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- L-distance ratio: a new distance ratio-based evaluation method for the diagnosis of cirrhosis using enhanced computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- A novel Laennec's capsule tunnel approach for pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: a propensity score matching study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to examine the inflow and outflow vascular system of the caudate lobe and determine its relevance to hepatobiliary surgery.
methodsA total of 41 cadaveric liver specimens were dissected in 2019 to evaluate the inflow and outflow vascular system of the caudate lobe.
resultsThe Glisson's pedicles of the paracaval portion were mainly from the right pedicle in 14 cases (34.15%), mainly from the left pedicle in 22 cases (53.66%), and equally from the left and right pedicle in 5 cases (12.19%). Many thick branches of the portal vein were found behind the plane consisting of the hilar plate and Arantius ligament, but none of them were thicker than 1 mm in front of the plane. All of the veins of the caudate lobe drained into the inferior vena cava (IVC) via the anterior face. There was an avascular zone without short hepatic veins (SHVs) consisting of loose connective tissue between the retrohepatic IVC and caudate lobe, with its length and width being 45-97 mm and 6-15 mm, respectively.
conclusionsThe plane consisting of the hilar plate and Arantius ligament can be regarded as the boundary between the caudate lobe and the other lobes. There is an avascular zone without SHVs consisting of loose connective tissue between the retrohepatic IVC and caudate lobe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.