ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
The assessment of the frequency and arrangement of the subsegmental branches of V3 using computed tomography angiography.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe frequency and arrangement of the subsegmental branches of the third portion of the vertebral artery (V3) have been assessed in small samples by autopsy, but they have not been assessed by computed tomography angiography (CTA). To determine the frequency and arrangement of subsegmental branches of V3 by CTA and to analyze the interrelationships among frequency, arrangement, sex, and side-to-side.
methodsFirst, the radiology records of 668 consecutive patients who underwent cervical or craniocervical CTA scans from October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. Second, the four demarcation points were ascertained to define the three subsegments by reviewing the resource images, namely, the vertical portion of V3(V3v), horizontal portion of V3(V3h), and extradural portion of V3(V3e). Then, the numerical value and the location of the bifurcating branch in each subsegment of V3 were recorded. Third, the frequency and arrangement of the branches was assessed, and the relationships between sex, laterality and frequency and arrangement were analyzed as well as the interobserver performance.
resultsOn the left, 25%, 20.21%, and 6.59% were the frequencies of one branch in the V3v, V3h, and V3e, and 1.05%, 0.00%, and 0.45% were the frequencies of two branches, respectively. On the right, 25.04%, 17.07%, and 6.44% were the frequencies of one branch in the V3v, V3h, and V3e, and 1.04%, 0.3%, and 0.15% were the frequencies of two branches, respectively. There were no differences between the side-to-side and numerical values of the branches according to the t-test (P=0.4341, P=0.7968), and there were no differences between the side-to-side variable, sex variable and number of branches according to the
conclusionsThe frequency and arrangement of V3 subsegmental branches could be displayed by source imaging with CTA, and there were no significant differences according to the sex or side of the individual. It was imperative to acquaint the subsegmental branches before the operation involving V3 in the craniocervical junction to determine the surgical approach and reduce bleeding during the surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.