Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816112›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2021

Effect of porosity of a functionally-graded scaffold for the treatment of corticosteroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rabbits.

Masahiro Maruyama, Chi-Chun Pan, Seyedsina Moeinzadeh, Hunter W Storaci, Roberto Alfonso Guzman, Elaine Lui, Masaya Ueno, Takeshi Utsunomiya, Ning Zhang, Claire Rhee and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Research progress in influence of microstructure on performance of triply-periodic minimal surface bone scaffolds].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Glucocorticoid, Covid-19, bone and nerve repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Masahiro MaruyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Chi-Chun PanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Seyedsina MoeinzadehDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Hunter W StoraciDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Roberto Alfonso GuzmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Elaine LuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Masaya UenoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Takeshi UtsunomiyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Claire RheeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Zhenyu YaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michiaki TakagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Stuart B GoodmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Yunzhi Peter YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: Core decompression (CD) with scaffold and cell-based therapies is a promising strategy for providing both mechanical support and regeneration of the osteonecrotic area for early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We designed a new 3D printed porous functionally-graded scaffold (FGS) with a central channel to facilitate delivery of transplanted cells in a hydrogel to the osteonecrotic area. However, the optimal porous structural design for the FGS for the engineering of bone in ONFH has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to fabricate and evaluate two different porous structures (30% or 60% porosity) of the FGSs in corticosteroid-associated ONFH in rabbits.

methodsTwo different FGSs with 30% or 60% porosity containing a 1-mm central channel were 3D printed using polycaprolactone and β-tricalcium phosphate. The FGS was 3-mm diameter and 32-mm length and was composed of three segments: 1-mm in length for the non-porous proximal segment, 22-mm in length for the porous (30% versus 60%) middle segment, and 9-mm in length for the 15% porous distal segment. Eighteen male New Zealand White rabbits were given a single dose of 20 ​mg/kg methylprednisolone acetate intramuscularly. Four weeks later, rabbits were divided into three groups: the CD group, the 30% porosity FGS group, and the 60% porosity FGS group. In the CD group, a 3-mm diameter drill hole was created into the left femoral head. In the FGS groups, a 30% or 60% porosity implant was inserted into the bone tunnel. Eight weeks postoperatively, femurs were harvested and microCT, mechanical, and histological analyses were performed.

resultsThe actual porosity and pore size of the middle segments were 26.4% ​± ​2.3% and 699 ​± ​56 ​μm in the 30% porosity FGS, and 56.0% ​± ​4.5% and 999 ​± ​71 ​μm in the 60% porosity FGS, respectively using microCT analysis. Bone ingrowth ratio in the 30% porosity FGS group was 73.9% ​± ​15.8%, which was significantly higher than 39.5% ​± ​13.0% in the CD group on microCT (p ​< ​0.05). Bone ingrowth ratio in the 60% porosity FGS group (61.3% ​± ​30.1%) showed no significant differences compared to the other two groups. The stiffness at the bone tunnel site in the 30% porosity FGS group was 582.4 ​± ​192.3 ​N/mm

conclusionThese findings indicate that the 30% porosity FGS may enhance bone regeneration and have superior biomechanical properties in the bone tunnel after CD in ONFH, compared to the 60% porosity FGS. TRANSLATION POTENTIAL STATEMENT: The translational potential of this article: This FGS implant holds promise for improving outcomes of CD for early stage ONFH.

Indexed as

Core decompressionFemoral headHipOsteonecrosisRabbitScaffold

Identifiers

PMID33816112
PMCPMC7995660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.