Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33816048›Full record

ArticleEPJ data science2021

The growing amplification of social media: measuring temporal and social contagion dynamics for over 150 languages on Twitter for 2009-2020.

Thayer Alshaabi, David Rushing Dewhurst, Joshua R Minot, Michael V Arnold, Jane L Adams, Christopher M Danforth, Peter Sheridan Dodds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EPJ data science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. "COVID19 is_": The Perpetuation of Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories via Google Autocomplete.Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Association for Information Science and Technology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thayer AlshaabiVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8971-4434
David Rushing DewhurstVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
Joshua R MinotVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
Michael V ArnoldVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
Jane L AdamsVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
Christopher M DanforthVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.
Peter Sheridan DoddsVermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working from a dataset of 118 billion messages running from the start of 2009 to the end of 2019, we identify and explore the relative daily use of over 150 languages on Twitter. We find that eight languages comprise 80% of all tweets, with English, Japanese, Spanish, Arabic, and Portuguese being the most dominant. To quantify social spreading in each language over time, we compute the 'contagion ratio': The balance of retweets to organic messages. We find that for the most common languages on Twitter there is a growing tendency, though not universal, to retweet rather than share new content. By the end of 2019, the contagion ratios for half of the top 30 languages, including English and Spanish, had reached above 1-the naive contagion threshold. In 2019, the top 5 languages with the highest average daily ratios were, in order, Thai (7.3), Hindi, Tamil, Urdu, and Catalan, while the bottom 5 were Russian, Swedish, Esperanto, Cebuano, and Finnish (0.26). Further, we show that over time, the contagion ratios for most common languages are growing more strongly than those of rare languages.

Indexed as

NLPSignal processingSocial contagionSociolinguisticsTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33816048
PMCPMC8010293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.