Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33815740›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Information Is Where You Find It: Perception as an Ecologically Well-Posed Problem.

William H Warren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mapping macaque to human cortex with natural scene responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. The myth of the Bayesian brain.European journal of applied physiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Behaviour setting transformation methodology, filling in the gaps of the conventional architectural design process.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Refocusing neuroscience: moving away from mental categories and towards complex behaviours.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Optic Flow: A History.i-Perception · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

William H WarrenBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-2315
Brown University · US

Funding

A vision-based model of locomotion in crowded environmentsR01EY029745 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WILLIAM H · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Texts on visual perception typically begin with the following premise: Vision is an ill-posed problem, and perception is underdetermined by the available information. If this were really the case, however, it is hard to see how vision could ever get off the ground. James Gibson's signal contribution was his hypothesis that

Indexed as

affordanceshigher order motionlocomotionoptic flowperception/actionsensory ecologythree-dimensional perception

Identifiers

PMID33815740
PMCPMC7995459
OpenAlexW3136749922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.