ArticleRadiology case reports2021
Management of severe COVID-19 patient with negative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: Role of clinical, radiological, and serological diagnosis.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical prediction models for diagnosis of COVID-19 among adult patients: a validation and agreement study.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Conceptual Design of the "Private Car" Self-Isolation Ecosystem for the 2019-nCoV Infection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Development of Clinical Risk Scores for Detection of COVID-19 in Suspected Patients During a Local Outbreak in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard in diagnosis for infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but the false-negative result is the problem in the prevention and control the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A false-negative of RT-PCR test needs to be evaluated when the patient showed a high clinical suspicion for COVID-19. We report a 36-year-old man with 4 times negative RT-PCR results, but clinical, radiological (chest X-ray and chest CT scan), and serological examinations showed a high suspicion of COVID-19. History of close contacted with COVID-19 confirmed patient was reported, and the wife of our case was also RT-PCR tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the next few days strengthen the COVID-19 diagnosis of our case patient. It is important to use the combination of RT-PCR, chest X-ray, chest CT scan, clinical manifestations, antibodies test, and exposure history of patients to diagnose COVID-19 and decide the early isolation and appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.