ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
First clinical experience with CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer therapy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Subtypes and Survival Patterns in Female Breast Cancer: Insights from a 12-Year Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Predictors and Outcomes in Breast Cancer Screening in Romania: Insights from Demographic, Clinical, and Lifestyle Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Molecular Particularities Still a Challenge.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Influence of Tumor-Specific Markers in Breast Cancer on Other Blood Parameters.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Based PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with metastatic or advanced disease, therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in addition to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or to the estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator fulvestrant has resulted in an additional therapy option and a longer progression-free survival. In the Gynecologic-Oncology Clinic, Diakonie-Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, we followed and registered our initial clinical experience with CDK4/6 inhibitors, following the side effects and tumor response over two years since they were officially approved for general use in Germany. Differences were observed when palbociclib or ribociclib was used in combination with letrozole or anastrozole or fulvestrant. The dynamic side effects and tumor response under therapy with palbociclib or ribociclib were found to be comparable with the main reported data in the official drug information. The CDK4/6 inhibitors have an important and promising role in the therapy of breast cancer patients. Patient age and therapy duration do not influence the use of palbociclib or ribociclib, although it may be important which AI is used in combination with palbociclib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.