ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2021
A
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel, low-cost bioreactor forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Methods for automated delineation and assessment of EMG responses evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation in diagnostic and closed-loop therapeutic applications.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveH-Reflex is a test that is carried out to measure the relative excitability of reflex pathways. Although reliable, conventional methods consist of performing many small steps, which requires a high level of attentiveness, and thus can carry an elevated risk of human error, despite proper training. Equipment that is available to perform those tests with different levels of automation are typically proprietary, inextensible by the user, and expensive. Here we present a novel MATLAB application that can accurately and reliably perform automated H-Reflex measurements, test the stimulating electrodes, and carry out typical subsequent analyses.
methodsThis application is a Graphical User Interface that works with inexpensive equipment and offers many important features such as measuring electrode impedance in-situ, automating lengthy measurements like recruitment curves and frequency response trials, standardizing electric stimulation properties, automatic exporting of digital data and metadata, and immediately analyzing acquired data with single-click events.
resultsOur new method was validated against conventional H-Reflex measurement methods with 2 anesthetized rats. The difference between acquired data using both methods was negligible (mean difference=0.0038; std=0.0121). Our app also detected electrode impedance with high accuracy (94%).
conclusionThe method presented here allows reliable and efficient automated H-reflex measurements and can accurately analyze the collected data. SIGNIFICANCE: The features provided by our app can speed up data collection and reduce human error, and unlike conventional methods, allow the user to analyze data immediately after the record. This can result in higher research quality and give broader access to the technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.