Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33815525›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of microbiology2021

Effects of Different Ambient Temperatures on Caecal Microbial Composition in Broilers.

Yuting Yang, Xing Li, Zhenhui Cao, Yinging Qiao, Qiuye Lin, Jianping Liu, Zhiyong Zhao, Qingcong An, Chunyong Zhang, Hongfu Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuting YangYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Xing LiYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Zhenhui CaoYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Yinging QiaoYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Qiuye LinCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Jianping LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular and Medical Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, The People's Republic of China.
Zhiyong ZhaoYunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Qingcong AnYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Chunyong ZhangYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Hongfu ZhangInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, The People's Republic of China.
Hongbin PanYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, The People's Republic of China.
Yunnan Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNanjing Normal University · CNYunnan Animal Science and Veterinary Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term or acute temperature stress affect the immune responses and alters the gut microbiota of broilers, but the influences of long-term temperature stress on stress biomarkers and the intestinal microbiota remains largely unknown. Therefore, we examined the effect of three long-term ambient temperatures (high (HC), medium (MC), and low (LC) temperature groups) on the gene expression of broilers' heat shock proteins (Hsps) and inflammation - related genes, as well as the caecal microbial composition. The results revealed that Hsp70 and Hsp90 levels in HC group significantly increased, and levels of Hsp70, Hsp90, IL-6, TNF-α, and NFKB1 in LC group were significantly higher than in MC group (

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacteriaCecumChickensFemaleHeat-Shock ProteinsMalePhylogenyTemperatureHeat-Shock Proteins16S rRNA sequencingbroilercaecal microbial compositionKEGG pathwaytemperature

Identifiers

PMID33815525
PMCPMC8008768
OpenAlexW3134304438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.