ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2021
How to Classify and Define Pituitary Tumors: Recent Advances and Current Controversies.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pituitary adenomas (PitNETs): from imaging biomarkers to clinical translation.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Astragaloside IV targets TUBB4B to inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis of pituitary tumor cells via the STMN1/ERK pathway.International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Transcription Factor-Based Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Practical Immunohistochemical Algorithms, Molecular Correlates, and Diagnostic Challenges in the 5th WHO Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics and pathological features of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma combined with hyperprolactinemia.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors-Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Brief Overview of Molecular Biology in Pituitary Adenomas with a Focus on Aggressive Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Social support and psychological distress of patients with pituitary adenomas: chain-mediated effects of self-efficacy and rumination.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea in Pre-operative Pituitary Adenoma: A Report of Two Cases.Cureus · 2024Article
- Collision of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor and anterior clinoid meningioma treated with a two-stage minimally invasive surgical strategy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Does New WHO 2022 Nomenclature of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Offer an Extra Edge to the Neurosurgeons for Its Management? A Narrative Review.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2024Review
- Personalized Management of Malignant and Non-Malignant Ectopic Mediastinal Thyroid: A Proposed 10-Item Algorithm Approach.Cancers · 2024Review
- Predicting the Consistency of Pituitary Macroadenomas: The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements for Surgical Planning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Aggressive/Refractory Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.International journal of endocrinology · 2024Review
- [Unification of pathomorphological examination of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pituitary gland. Controversial issues of the new classification].Problemy endokrinologii · 2023Review
- Classifying Pituitary Adenoma Invasiveness Based on Radiological, Surgical and Histological Features: A Retrospective Assessment of 903 Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Molecular Pathways in Prolactinomas: Translational and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Dealing With Brain MRI Findings in Pediatric Patients With Endocrinological Conditions: Less Is More?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pituitary Adenomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- FROM 'NULL CELL ADENOMA' TO REFINED DIAGNOSIS: PITFALLS IN PITUITARY MASS EVALUATION.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pituitary tumors are very complex and heterogeneous and have a very wide range of proliferative and aggressive behaviors, and how to define and classify these tumors remains controversial. This review summarizes the epidemiology and progress in the classification and definition of pituitary tumors, as well as controversial issues. Based on the results of radiologic and autopsy studies, the prevalence of pituitary tumors has recently increased significantly. However, the majority of pituitary tumors are incidentally discovered and asymptomatic, and such tumors are called pituitary incidentalomas. Most of these incidentalomas do not induce symptoms, remain stable in size, and do not need treatment. The recent revised classification strategies mainly depend on immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect pituitary hormones and pituitary transcription factors; therefore, the accuracy of diagnosing pituitary tumors has improved. Although new classification strategies and definitions for pituitary tumors have been presented, there are still some controversies. The term pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) was proposed by the International Pituitary Pathology Club, and this terminology can encompass the unpredictable malignant behavior seen in the subset of aggressive pituitary adenomas (PAs). However, some endocrinologists who oppose this change in terminology have argued that the use of tumor in the terminology is misleading, as it gives PAs a harmful connotation when the majority are not aggressive. Such terminology may add new ambiguity to the origin of PAs and unnecessary anxiety and frustration for the majority of patients with benign PAs. The classification of aggressive PAs mainly relies on subjective judgment of clinical behavior and lacks objective biomarkers and unified diagnostic criteria. However, the term "refractory" could more accurately represent the characteristics of these tumors, including their clinical behaviors, radiological features, and pathologic characteristics. Moreover, the diagnostic criteria for refractory PAs are stricter, more objective, and more accurate than those for aggressive PAs. Early identification of patients with these tumors through recognition and increased awareness of the definition of refractory PAs will encourage the early use of aggressive therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.