Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33815188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Italian Community Psychology in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Shared Feelings and Thoughts in the Storytelling of University Students.

Immacolata Di Napoli, Elisa Guidi, Caterina Arcidiacono, Ciro Esposito, Elena Marta, Cinzia Novara, Fortuna Procentese, Andrea Guazzini, Barbara Agueli, Florencia Gonzáles Leone and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Community dimensions and emotions in the era of COVID-19.Journal of community & applied social psychology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Immacolata Di NapoliDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Elisa GuidiDepartment of Education, Literatures, Intercultural Studies, Languages and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Caterina ArcidiaconoDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ciro EspositoDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Elena MartaCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, Italy.
Cinzia NovaraDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Fortuna ProcenteseDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Andrea GuazziniDepartment of Education, Literatures, Intercultural Studies, Languages and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Barbara AgueliDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Florencia Gonzáles LeoneDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Patrizia MeringoloDepartment of Education, Literatures, Intercultural Studies, Languages and Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Daniela MarzanaCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how young Italian people experienced the period of peak spread of COVID-19 in their country by probing their emotions, thoughts, events, and actions related to interpersonal and community bonds. This approach to the pandemic will highlight social dimensions that characterized contextual interactions from the specific perspective of Community Psychology. The aim was to investigate young people's experiences because they are the most fragile group due to their difficulty staying home and apart from their peers and because they are, at the same time, the most potentially dangerous people due to their urge to gather in groups. The research involved 568 university students, 475 females, and 93 males, with an average age of 21.82 years (SD = 4.836). The collected data were analyzed with the Grounded Theory Methodology, using the Atlas 8.0 software. From the textual data, representative codes were defined and grouped into 10 categories, which reflect the individuals' prosocial attitudes, behaviors, and values. These categories formed three macro-categories, called: "Collective Dimensions," which includes Connectedness, Solidarity, Italian-ness, Social Problems, and Collective Mourning; "Prosocial Orientation," which includes Trust and Hope; and "Collective Values," which includes Values of Freedom, Respect of Social Rules, and Civic-Mindedness. All these macro-categories are indicative of the shared feelings experienced by Italians during the first time of the pandemic. Further practical implications of these results will be discussed, including a consideration of the risk of developing distress and improving well-being, as well as promoting preventive behaviors.

Indexed as

civic-mindednesscollective mourningCOVID-19emotional and action connectednesssolidaritytrust

Identifiers

PMID33815188
PMCPMC8012730
OpenAlexW3139042857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.