ArticleHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2020
Predictors of academic integrity in undergraduate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students.
Article in Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Academic and Fieldwork Performance in Occupational Therapy Students: A Systematic Review.Occupational therapy international · 2023Pooled it
- Status of scientific research integrity knowledge in dental undergraduates from 34 universities in China.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- The hidden influence: Medical students' knowledge and attitude of conflict of interest-A cross-sectional study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and dental education: Implications for reflective assignments and qualitative research.Journal of dental education · 2024Article
- Exploration of Students' Perception of Academic Misconduct: Do Individual Factors, Moral Philosophy, Behavioral Intention, and Judgment Matter?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.