Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814927›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2021

The Analgesic Effects of Thoracic Paravertebral Block versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Xiao-Long Liang, Ran An, Qi Chen, Hong-Liang Liu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05922449 (Using Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Lung Preservation During VATS Pulmonary Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05922449 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Using Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Lung Preservation During VATS Pulmonary Surgery: A Dual Center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tongren HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled302ConditionsPostoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsArmsThoracic Paravertebral Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Epidurals in esophagectomy: end of an era?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Thoracic paravertebral block improves the prognosis of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Long LiangChongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7346-2933
Ran AnChongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.
Qi ChenChongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8711-155X
Hong-Liang LiuChongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.
Chongqing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, there is no definitive evidence for the analgesic effects and side effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) versus thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) after thoracoscopic surgery. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to analyze the analgesic effects of TEA versus TPVB after thoracoscopic surgery.

methodsWe systematically searched RCTs published by October 26, 2020, in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library and conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the analgesic effects of TEA versus TPVB after thoracoscopic surgery. The primary measure was postoperative pain score, and the secondary measures were postoperative 24-hour usage of opioids, hypotension, postoperative nausea, and vomiting.

resultsA total of 458 patients from five RCTs were included in this study. After thoracoscopic surgery, the numerical rating scale (NRS) score for resting pain was higher in the TPVB group than in the TEA group at 1-2 hours and 4-6 hours after surgery (MD = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.64, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%; MD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.70, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). The postoperative 24-hour usage of morphine was higher in the TPVB group than in the TEA group (SMD = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.31; P = 0.04; I2 = 84%). The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the TEA group (OR = 4.52; 95% CI = 2.03 to 10.10; P = 0.0002; I

conclusionCompared with TPVB, TEA provides statistically significant but clinically unimportant short-term benefits following thoracoscopic surgery.

Indexed as

meta-analysisthoracic epidural anesthesiathoracic paravertebral blockthoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID33814927
PMCPMC8009548
OpenAlexW3136210172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.