Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814875›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2021

Surrogate Residuals for Discrete Choice Models.

Chao Cheng, Rui Wang, Heping Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A new goodness-of-fit measure for probit models: Surrogate RThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Chao ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Rui WangDepartment of Public Economics, School of Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Heping ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Yale University · USXiamen University · CN

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Analysis of Big Data Squared in Biomedical StudiesR01MH116527 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Analysis of Genomic and Complex DataR01HG010171 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010171NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrete choice models (DCMs) are a class of models for modeling response variables that take values from a set of alternatives. Examples include logistic regression, probit regression, and multinomial logistic regression. These models are also referred together as generalized linear models. Although there exist methods for the goodness of fit of DCMs, defining intuitive residuals for such models has been difficult due to the fact that the responses are categorical values instead of continuous numbers. In this article, we propose the surrogate residual for DCMs based on the surrogate approach (Liu and Zhang 2018), which deals with an ordinal response. We consider categorical responses that may or may not be ordered. We shall show that our residual can be used to diagnose misspecification in the aspects of mean structure, individual-specific coefficients, and interaction effects. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Indexed as

Categorical outcomeModel diagnosticsMultinominal logistic regressionResidual analysis

Identifiers

PMID33814875
PMCPMC8018589
OpenAlexW3034115840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.