Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814873›Full record

ReviewJournal of developmental and physical disabilities2022

Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disability: A Mega-Review of the Literature.

Becky Crowe, Wendy Machalicek, Qi Wei, Christine Drew, Jay Ganz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of developmental and physical disabilities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Vulnerability and Pediatric Pain.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Becky CroweDepartment of Special Education and Clinical Sciences, University of Oregon, 1589 E 15th Street, Eugene, OR 97403 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3721-8778
Wendy MachalicekDepartment of Special Education and Clinical Sciences, University of Oregon, 1589 E 15th Street, Eugene, OR 97403 USA.
Qi WeiDepartment of Special Education and Clinical Sciences, University of Oregon, 1589 E 15th Street, Eugene, OR 97403 USA.
Christine DrewDepartment of Special Education, Rehabilitation and Counseling, Auburn University, Auburn, AL USA.
Jay GanzDepartment of Special Education and Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing evidence- and research-based practices relies upon research synthesis of individual studies in reviews and meta analyses. Further summarizing scientific evidence about a specific topic by synthesizing reviews is an area of need to determine practices that have a strong evidence base and to identify areas of methodological weakness and gaps in the literature. A mega-review of literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on interventions using aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities from 2000 to mid-2020 was conducted. Participant and interventionist demographics, interventions, settings, outcomes, and recommendations of each review were reported and summarized. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews Revised (AMSTAR 2; Shea et al., 2017) was used to examine the methodological rigor of 84 included reviews. Over the past 20 years, published reviews have increased slightly in methodological rigor but demonstrate a number of methodological weaknesses that detract from the strength of evidence for AAC interventions with this population. Suggestions for improving the methodological rigor of literature reviews and areas for future research specific to AAC interventions are discussed.

Indexed as

Aided communicationAugmentative and alternative communicationDevelopmental disabilitiesMega-reviewResearch synthesisReview

Identifiers

PMID33814873
PMCPMC8009928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.