Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814798›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021

Comparison of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) in Women with Pregnancy-Associated Sepsis with Respect to Critical Care Admission and Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study.

Rachna Agarwal, Penzy Goyal, Medha Mohta, Rajarshi Kar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachna AgarwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, 110095 India.
Penzy GoyalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, 110095 India.
Medha MohtaDepartment of Anaesthesia, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, 110095 India.
Rajarshi KarDepartment of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, 110095 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to determine performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS), in women with pregnancy-associated sepsis (PAS) with respect to critical care admission and mortality.

methodsObstetric patients with PAS fulfilling any 2 of the quick SOFA (qSOFA) criteria were enrolled as cases. The various parameters of SOFA and SOS were recorded at admission and compared for outcomes.

resultsCritical care was required in 32 (50.7%) patients and associated mortality was high (31.7%). For our study population, a threshold of SOFA ≥ 6 had the best combination of sensitivity (84.4%) and specificity (61.3%) for critical care admission. For SOS, a cut-off value of ≥ 6 gave best sensitivity (64%) and specificity (40%) for the same.

conclusionsSOFA was far more predictive of patient's critical condition as well as mortality compared to SOS. SOFA was superior to SOS in determining critical care admission and mortality for PAS.

Indexed as

Obstetric sepsisPregnancy-associated sepsisSOFASOS

Identifiers

PMID33814798
PMCPMC7960863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.